Tagged: Insurance RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

 
  • zyakaira 4:01 pm on July 21, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Insurance, , , , ,   

    More Capital for Reliance ADA Grp 

    At its RNRL and Reliance Capital AGMs today, Anil Ambani announced new Capital raising plans for its Insurance and Infrastructure companies including the Western Freeway Sealink, utilizing the current buoyancy in the markets to “unlock value” Thus efforts continue to overcome challenges to RNRL from the new legal action by customers and Government for actioning RIL PSC (Production Share Contracts)
     
    Reliance ADA Grp made plans public for spending Rs 10000 Crores ($2b) to add 20MT pa capacity in Cement making apart from reiterating its earlier plans for Insurance ( That would be a large 1000 cr, $200m issue before QIP). Reliance also announced that it would be diversifying into Investment Banking later this year. They have recently floated a Domestic Investor focussed Private Equity fund and will obviously learn from previous aborted ventures of Rel Capital when it was more a shared concern of the two brothers as also a direct support line for Grand Ambani plans
     
    In related news, Yes Bank has also organized a $250 m QIP while, IDFC has added 40K ESOPs to its capital and IFCI has acquired Rs 300 cr ( $60m of MCX from the software team at FTIL) The iron is hot, and ADA has always been the more financially literate and savvy teams.
     
     
    [Tags India, India Infrastructure, IPOs, Infrastructure, Indian Economy, Reliance ADA, Anil Ambani]

    Posted via email from The investment blog on Post

     
  • zyakaira 10:40 am on June 26, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Insurance, , ,   

    Pension Reform : Investment flexibility added April 2009 

    As a sign of increasing confidence in the expansion of private pension systems in India, the Indian Ministry of Finance recently announced an increase in investment flexibility. This will be effective from 1 April 2009 for non-governmental provident funds, superannuation and gratuity funds.
     
    In common with the practice in many developing countries, there have always been significant restrictions on how these funds could be invested, with a considerable bias toward local investments and toward government securities. This latest revision to the investment pattern gives a welcome expansion to the available universe of investment options and will give more flexibility for investment management within the revised ceilings available for different categories of investment.
     
    The revised investment pattern is as follows:
     
    Instrument
    Revised investment pattern
    (Investment pattern dated January 2005)
    Government securities and mutual funds dedicated to government securities, regulated by the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
    Up to 55%
    ( Minimum 40%)
    Debit securities (issued by corporate bodies, including banks and public financial institutions); term deposit receipts (issued by scheduled commercial banks) and rupee bonds
    Up to 40%
    ( Minimum 25%)
    Money market instruments, including units of money market mutual funds
    Up to 5%
    (Previously not allowed )
    Equities
    Up to 15%
    (Up to 5% )
    Equity-linked schemes of mutual funds regulated by the SEBI
     
    Up to 10%
     
    Within the above instruments, it should be noted that investment in equities is limited to shares of companies for which derivatives are available on the Bombay Stock Exchange or the National Stock Exchange. However, this does cover more than 250 stocks, which would now be available. Concerning debt securities, these should have a duration of at least three years, and at least 75 percent of investments need to be investment grade. Bonds denominated in Indian currency and issued by multilateral agencies such as the International Finance Corporation, a member of the World Bank Group or the Asian Development Bank must also have a maturity of at least three years. The required duration for term deposit receipts has been changed from a maximum of three years to a minimum of one year. Overall, this is a significant extension of flexibility in creating a range of bond portfolios.
     
    Apart from a specific limit on exposure to mutual funds, which is not to be more than 5 percent of the portfolio at any time, there are some further significant relaxations around trading and the monitoring of the investment pattern. While the investment pattern must be in place at the end of each year, movement is allowed during the year provided that each category does not exceed the investment pattern limit by more than 10 percent. Also, the entire portfolio can be treated as tradable and exposed to active management. Rather than the old limit of 10 percent of the portfolio being tradable, the only limit now is that the overall turnover ratio (that is, the value of securities traded during the year divided by the average value of the portfolio during the year) should not be more than 2 percent.
     
    Funds will now have more flexibility to manage the assets held under pension schemes. Hence, investment decisions will become more complex. The trustees of the pension funds will need to be well informed about the investment options available in the market and also ensure compliance with the prescribed guidelines. Pension governance will become more important.
     
    Around the world, much is written about the techniques and management of portfolios to get best outcomes and match the requirements of participants. The additional flexibility will allow Indian employers opportunities to improve their funds for the benefit of participants. Effort expended on considering how to take advantage of the additional flexibility should be very worthwhile.

    Posted via email from The investment blog on Post

     
  • zyakaira 9:10 am on June 26, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Insurance, , ,   

    Strange Unrest in Insurance FDI 

    The new Private Sector Insurance guidelines raising FDI limit to 49% have really scared the Indian partners in these firms. The norms now require the public holding after the inevitable IPO to be a minimum 25% and thus the Indian promoter is likely to end up with 26%. However, in the IPO both partners have to sell equally proportions of shares into the market thus leaving ramping up of FDI intuitively to post IPO capital ‘additions’ as the Indian promoters’ equity is actually capped at 26%
     
    In all, this is a simple enough reform as mandated by the market conditions, capital is relatively expensive in our market as also PPP mandates here that we use USD or EUR (or CHF) from abroad Some quick IPOs hitting the market will raise Capital base of these Insurance companies to 3-4 times its current values by a good 2500-3000 Crores from IPOs and the same amount from FDI later
     
    LIC’s equity market investments of INR 40000 crores are also likely to shore up now, given strengthening market conditions and the boo of INR 300000 Crores is now likely to be well capitalised after the IPO brings in a public stake and govt ownership is reduced by the (yet to be public ) 10-15%

    Posted via email from The investment blog on Post

     
  • c
    compose new post
    j
    next post/next comment
    k
    previous post/previous comment
    r
    reply
    e
    edit
    o
    show/hide comments
    t
    go to top
    l
    go to login
    h
    show/hide help
    shift + esc
    cancel
    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.